5/6/2023 0 Comments Elucidate the mechanimsSimilarly, our framework also focuses on different aspects of social interaction, with a main emphasis on its link with the tendency of individuals to align their motions, emotions and cognitions, observed in various everyday situations (i.e., social alignment) ( Raafat et al., 2009 Shamay-Tsoory et al., 2019). For example, Redcay and Schilbach (2019) provide an extensive review on the second-person approach's contribution to studying several key components of social interaction. There are other common denominators between these two frameworks. ![]() Thus, it can be concluded that even though more experimental results are required, we appear to be on the verge of uncovering the neural mechanisms associated with real-life face-to-face interactions. Both models highlight similar brain regions as playing a crucial role in supporting face-to-face reciprocal social interactions. Notably, although our findings and the findings by Redcay and Schilbach (2019) are differentially based on distinct literature ( Redcay and Schilbach (2019) on the comparison between traditional and second-person studies, and our model on interbrain synchronization studies), they both reach a similar conclusion. We concluded that face-to-face naturalistic interactions seem to increase the coupling between participants' “mutual social attention systems,” resulting in more attunement, and in greater allocation of attention and involvement in a specific social interaction, its participants and its goals ( Dai et al., 2018 Fishburn et al., 2018 Davidesco et al., 2019). We provide the mechanisms and several examples throughout the article of how this inter-brain neural synchrony between the “mutual social attention systems” of interacting partners facilitates more attunement and greater allocation of attention to a specific social interaction, its participants and its goals, while tuning out other potential interactions. I was pleased to see that their mentalizing network has much in common with what my colleague and I recently deemed as the “mutual social attention systems” of interacting partners-i.e., the coupling between participants' TPJ and/or prefrontal cortices during social interactions ( Gvirts and Perlmutter, 2019). Importantly, the authors suggest that it may underlie the feeling of involvement with the interactive partner during reciprocal social interaction ( Redcay and Schilbach, 2019). Interestingly, this comparison highlights the role of the neural “mentalizing network” (including the ventromedial and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the temporoparietal junction TPJ) within studies employing participants engaged in reciprocal social interactions- second-person studies ( Konvalinka and Roepstorff, 2012 Schilbach et al., 2013), compared to studies employing conventional psychological approaches. To this end, they compared the emerging second-person neuroscientific studies with the more traditional neuroscience approach of recording brain activity while participants observed social interactions in a third- person context (rather than an interactive participant). One of the aims of these authors was to uncover the neural mechanism uniquely associated with this real-time reciprocal social interaction. ![]() In this opinion article, the authors review the emerging literature of second-person neuroscientific studies, in which participants are engaged in reciprocal social interactions. I read with interest the recently published paper by Redcay and Schilbach (2019).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |